Mobile Robot Guide

  • Home
  • News
  • Systems / Platforms
    • Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMRs)
    • Automatic Guided Vehicles (AGVs)
    • Autonomous Forklifts
    • Drones / UAVs
    • Other Systems / Platforms
  • Markets / Industries
    • Agriculture
    • Construction & Mining
    • Consumer / Office
    • Defense / Security / Public Safety
    • Education / Research
    • Healthcare / Medical
    • Hospitality / Travel
    • Logistics / Warehouse / Transportation
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail / Wholesale
    • Energy / Utilities
    • Other
  • Applications
    • Move
      • Delivery
      • Intralogistics
    • Perform
      • Disinfecting
      • Telepresence
      • Manipulating
      • Vacuuming
      • Washing
    • Sense
      • Inspection
      • Search
      • Surveillance
      • Surveying
      • Mapping
      • Exploration
    • Other Applications
      • Development
      • Research
  • Resources
    • AMR Glossary
    • FAQ
    • Case Study
    • Find a Vendor
    • What is Robots as a Service
    • Mobile Robot Standards
    • Websites
      • The Robot Report
      • Robotics Business Review
      • Collaborative Robotics Trends
    • Webinars and Digital Events
    • Publications
      • Robotic Solutions for COVID-19
    • Newsletter
  • Events
    • 2021 Robotics Weeks
    • Robotics Summit & Expo
    • RoboBusiness Direct
    • Field Robotics Forum
    • 2022 RBR50 Awards
    • R&D 100
  • Podcast
    • Podcast Archives

Autonomous Mobile Robot Mapping

By Mike Oitzman | April 10, 2018

Step 1: Autonomous Mobile Robot Mapping

In this section, you will learn about:

  • Mapping strategies for mobile robots
  • What localization means
  • How to recover your system when it gets lost

I Map, therefore I am – Desrobotis, 21st century



Click to Tweet

Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) is a core function for the safe navigation any autonomous mobile robot. Most mobile robots today leverage at least one LIDAR scanner on the vehicle to see what’s in front of the vehicle. Data from sensor is used as an input to the SLAM functions of the software and used to build a map of the facility.

Let’s break down what SLAM really means for the operation of a mobile robot. First of all, mobile robots can operate in either a structured on an unstructured environment. The environment may also be a mix of structured or unstructured elements. A structured environment is one which is clearly defined and without (many) variables in the path of the robot. Examples of a “variables” (from the robots perspective) include: people, boxes/crates, fork trucks, doors, elevators, or other mobile robots.

On the other hand, an unstructured environment is one which contains many variables and which is constantly changing. An example of a highly unstructured environment would be a warehouse full of fork trucks and people (constantly moving pallets), a manufacturing floor, an office building or a hospital.

AGV’s have classically operated in highly structured environments. By sticking to predefined paths and following magnetic tape or magnets in the floor for guidance, an AGV can traverse this environment safely without the concern of having any internal map of the facility. On the other hand, to operate autonomously in an unstructured environment, an AMR has to generate and maintain a map of the facility and keep track of where it is currently located within the facility. A robot which is turned off (or runs out of battery power), may wake up and be confused about where it is currently located. The easiest way to build and maintain a map of facility is to use LIDAR data to see and understand the world around the robot. The AMR can then compare sensor data to estimate where it thinks it is in the facility and to keep itself “localized” on the map.

AMR’s operating outdoors have the advantage of using GPS data to help provide location data, but they have other navigation issues to worry about as outdoor operation is highly unstructured.

The first step in SLAM, is to map the facility. This typically requires that an operator walk the robot robot around the facility while the robot maps its motion and builds an internal map of facility. Alternatively, some AMR’s can autonomously map a facility by driving (slowly) around the facility and using the sensor data to avoid obstacles and map the facility. Mapping is best done when there are as few variables (i.e. people, fork trucks) as possible in it’s view. Furthermore, most AMR mapping procedures require an operator to review the facility map generated during the mapping process. During the editing process, the operator will delete erroneous elements in the map and edit in map features which help the robot understand how to path plan through the facility. Map features might include “no go” zones (i.e. offices, aisles, hallways), one-way corridors, speed control areas and door opening points, etc.

Once the AMR has mapped the facility, it can begin operation by first being “localized” to a specific location in the map. This step is critical when there are regions which are similar on the map. For example, the robot might not know which corner or hallway it is starting in. However, once localized, the robot can maintain its localization (the “simultaneous” part) while navigating the facility. It’s the same way that you drive your car, starting from a known location (e.g. your house) and then choosing a path to the store. Along the way, you check the streets to make sure that you’re on the right path. Robot who lose their localization can become “lost” which generally results in the mobile robot stopping its journey and reporting an error to its operator.

Another feature of SLAM is how the robot chooses to integrate new data into its map as it navigates throughout the facility. For example, if a fork truck is parked in a aisle which the robot has already mapped, how does the robot know that the fork truck is a permanent feature or a temporary feature of the aisle? And what does it do with the information which it has just seen?

How an AMR uses new information and whether it integrates it into the facility map is unique for each AMR vendor. Also, when multiple AMR’s are operating in a facility, new information may be shared the other AMR’s in the facility so that they can path plan around an obstacle.

You may also like:

  • an aerial view of images of Chris Anker Sørensen painted on soccer pitch
    Tour du France tribute to Chris Anker Sørensen painted by…
  • Karl Wente receives new Monarch Tractor
    Monarch Tractor denied autonomous permit by Cal/OSHA
  • Melonee Wise Fetch Zebra robots
    Melonee Wise Joins the TAILOS Board of Directors
  • geekplus resink deal
    Geek+ and Reesink Logistic Solutions announce new partnership
  • The Keenon Booth at Automatica 2022
    KEENON Robotics showcases services AMR lineup at Automatica 2022.
  • proteus AMR
    A decade after acquiring Kiva, Amazon unveils its first AMR

Tell Us What You Think! Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Related Articles Read More >

May 2022 top 10
Top 10 mobile robotic stories of May
AGV robot vs AMR robot
What’s the difference between an AMR and an AGV?
The Best Of CES Robotics 2021
Best Of CES Robotics 2021
Five Predictions for 2021 for mobile robots
Five Predictions for Mobile Robots in 2021

RBR50 Innovation Awards

The Robot Report Listing Database

THE ROBOT REPORT PODCAST

July 1, 2022
Brian Gerkey from Open Robotics discusses the development of ROS

Recent Articles

  • Brian Gerkey on the success of Open Robotics and ROS
  • an aerial view of images of Chris Anker Sørensen painted on soccer pitch Tour du France tribute to Chris Anker Sørensen painted by robot
  • Anders Beck introduces the UR20; California bans autonomous tractors
  • Karl Wente receives new Monarch Tractor Monarch Tractor denied autonomous permit by Cal/OSHA
  • Melonee Wise Fetch Zebra robots Melonee Wise Joins the TAILOS Board of Directors

Latest Robotics News

Subscribe to the Mobile Robot Guide newsletter

Check out our COVID-19 resources page

Subscribe to the Mobile Robot Guide newsletter

Tweets by RoboticTips

Mobile Robot Guide
  • The Robot Report
  • Robotic Business Review
  • Collaborative Robotics
  • Field Robotics Forum
  • Healthcare Robotics
  • Robo Business
  • Robotics Summit & Expo
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Copyright © 2022 WTWH Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media
Privacy Policy | Advertising | About Us

Search

  • Home
  • News
  • Systems / Platforms
    • Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMRs)
    • Automatic Guided Vehicles (AGVs)
    • Autonomous Forklifts
    • Drones / UAVs
    • Other Systems / Platforms
  • Markets / Industries
    • Agriculture
    • Construction & Mining
    • Consumer / Office
    • Defense / Security / Public Safety
    • Education / Research
    • Healthcare / Medical
    • Hospitality / Travel
    • Logistics / Warehouse / Transportation
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail / Wholesale
    • Energy / Utilities
    • Other
  • Applications
    • Move
      • Delivery
      • Intralogistics
    • Perform
      • Disinfecting
      • Telepresence
      • Manipulating
      • Vacuuming
      • Washing
    • Sense
      • Inspection
      • Search
      • Surveillance
      • Surveying
      • Mapping
      • Exploration
    • Other Applications
      • Development
      • Research
  • Resources
    • AMR Glossary
    • FAQ
    • Case Study
    • Find a Vendor
    • What is Robots as a Service
    • Mobile Robot Standards
    • Websites
      • The Robot Report
      • Robotics Business Review
      • Collaborative Robotics Trends
    • Webinars and Digital Events
    • Publications
      • Robotic Solutions for COVID-19
    • Newsletter
  • Events
    • 2021 Robotics Weeks
    • Robotics Summit & Expo
    • RoboBusiness Direct
    • Field Robotics Forum
    • 2022 RBR50 Awards
    • R&D 100
  • Podcast
    • Podcast Archives